简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In this OspreyFX review, we evaluate its fees, safety, platforms, pros and cons, and how it compares to other brokers in 2025.
We tested OspreyFX’s spreads and commission structure on EUR/USD and BTC/USD pairs. The platform delivers extremely tight spreads—sometimes 0.1 pips on major FX—but adds a $7/lot commission. While the raw pricing is attractive for high-volume traders, casual users may find commissions add up.
Whats more, the lack of regulation and platform instability during news spikes (e.g., connection losses) poses considerable risks that outweigh cost advantages for most traders.
While its ECN spreads and crypto funding are compelling, brokers like IC Markets or Pepperstone provide comparable pricing with regulation. For safety-conscious users, the tradeoff is not worth it.
Pros | Cons |
Tight raw spreads from 0.1 pips | Not regulated by any authority |
Crypto-friendly deposits & withdrawals | Service shutting down in 2025 |
TradingView-enabled TradeLocker | No MT4/MT5 support |
ECN/STP execution model | Numerous negative reviews on withdrawals and support |
Mobile access and modern interface | No copy trading, no investor compensation scheme |
OspreyFXs proposition is appealing on the surface, but traders must weigh its speed and spread advantage against the unregulated structure and poor trust record.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.