简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Recent discussions in online communities have raised serious questions about IQCent—a platform that has come under fire for its alleged withdrawal issues and questionable reliability. According to WikiFX, IQCent has received an alarmingly low trust score of 1.49/10, prompting many investors to rethink their involvement with this platform.
Recent discussions in online communities have raised serious questions about IQCent—a platform that has come under fire for its alleged withdrawal issues and questionable reliability. According to WikiFX, IQCent has received an alarmingly low trust score of 1.49/10, prompting many investors to rethink their involvement with this platform.
One of the most pressing concerns among users is the reported inability to withdraw funds from their IQCent accounts. Multiple accounts on social media have aired similar grievances, with investors warning others about the difficulty—or outright impossibility—of retrieving their investments. The inability to withdraw not only erodes trust but also raises suspicions regarding the overall legitimacy of the platform.
A key piece of evidence against IQCent comes from WikiFX. IQCents score of 1.49 out of 10 is a stark indicator of underlying issues, such as:
Across various social media channels, active members of the trading community have voiced strong warnings regarding IQCent and similar platforms. The call to avoid further deposits if withdrawals are hindered is becoming a common refrain. These warnings are a reminder that:
If youve experienced difficulty withdrawing funds from IQCent or related platforms like Bacoins or Cowcoin, consider this a critical warning sign. It is essential not only to rely on high returns as a promise but also to scrutinize the fundamental trustworthiness of the service provider. Here are some steps you can take:
The issues surrounding IQCent highlight a broader challenge in todays financial markets—ensuring that high returns do not come at the cost of liquidity and transparency. The combination of withdrawal problems, alarmingly low trust ratings from WikiFX, and vocal community warnings indicates that caution is warranted. Investors must undertake extensive research and trust their gut when something seems amiss. Your financial security is too important to risk on platforms that fail to live up to their promises.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
OctaFX has been officially listed on warning lists by both Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) and the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC). These alerts raise serious concerns about the broker’s status and whether it is legally allowed to operate in Malaysia.
Established in 2020, Errante has rapidly gained recognition in the forex and CFD trading industry. With a commitment to transparency, client protection, and a diverse range of trading services, Errante caters to both novice and experienced traders. This review provides an in-depth look at Errante's offerings, regulatory standing, trading conditions, and more.
IronFX Review 2025: Explore the broker’s AAAA WikiFX rating, global regulations, and $500,000 trading prize. Is it trustworthy or a scam? Dive into our transparent analysis!
In an industry where safety and transparency are essential, the regulatory status of online brokers has never been more important. For traders seeking to protect their capital, ensuring that a platform operates under recognised and stringent oversight can make all the difference. Keep reading to learn more about TradingPRO and its licenses.