简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:JP Morgan hit with $18M fine for SEC whistleblower rule violation. Learn about the case and its implications. Stay informed with our updates.
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) has found itself in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has agreed to pay a substantial $18 million penalty to resolve allegations of wrongdoing. The SEC has accused JPMS of obstructing its clients from reporting potential violations of securities laws to the regulatory body, a clear violation of whistleblower protection rules.
Here's the crux of the matter: From March 2020 to July 2023, JPMS repeatedly requested its retail clients to sign confidential release agreements, but only if they had received credits or settlements from the company exceeding $1,000. These confidential agreements mandated that clients keep any information related to the settlement and underlying facts confidential. More importantly, these agreements prohibited clients from voluntarily reaching out to the SEC, even though they were allowed to respond to SEC inquiries.
The SEC has come down hard on JPMS for this practice. According to Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, “Whether it's in your employment contracts, settlement agreements, or elsewhere, you simply cannot include provisions that prevent individuals from contacting the SEC with evidence of wrongdoing.” Essentially, JPMS put its clients in a difficult situation by making them choose between receiving settlements or credits from the firm and reporting possible securities law violations to the SEC. This either-or scenario not only compromised critical investor protections but was also found to be illegal.
Corey Schuster, Co-Chief of the Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit, emphasized that “Investors, whether retail or otherwise, must be free to report complaints to the SEC without any interference.” Anyone drafting or using confidentiality agreements needs to ensure they do not include provisions that obstruct potential whistleblowers.
JPMS has been found in violation of Rule 21F-17(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a whistleblower protection rule explicitly prohibiting actions that hinder individuals from communicating directly with the SEC staff regarding possible securities law violations. While JPMS did not admit wrongdoing, it agreed to a series of measures. These include accepting censure, committing to cease from violating the whistleblower protection rule in the future, and paying the $18 million civil penalty.
The SEC's investigation into JPMS's practices was conducted by Marie DeBonis and Jessica Neiterman, with the assistance of John Farinacci, and it was overseen by Virginia Rosado Desilets, Brianna Ripa, Mr. Schuster, and Andrew Dean, all members of the SEC's Asset Management Unit. Rua Kelly of the Trial Unit also provided support during the investigation.
In conclusion, JPMS's $18 million penalty underscores the importance of adhering to whistleblower protection rules and ensuring that individuals, regardless of their position, can freely report concerns to the SEC. This case serves as a stark reminder that the integrity of our financial system relies on transparency and accountability, and actions that obstruct these principles will not be tolerated.
Explore J.P. Morgan's profile on WikiFX for in-depth information: Visit their WikiFX page here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/8981623292.html
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Malaysia has seen a persistent rise in money game schemes, luring thousands of unsuspecting investors with promises of high returns and minimal risk. These schemes operate under various disguises, from investment clubs to digital asset platforms, yet they all follow the same fundamental principle—new investors fund the profits of earlier participants. Once the cycle collapses, the majority are left with devastating losses. Despite repeated warnings and high-profile cases, many Malaysians continue to fall victim. What drives this phenomenon?
Launched in 2008, Axi (formerly Axitrader), is an Australia-registered online forex broker that has gained solid development these years. Globally and heavily regulated, the Axi brand has several entities operating under different jurisdictions, including ASIC in Australia, FCA in the UK, CYSEC in Cyprus, FMA in New Zealand, and DFSA in the United Arab Emirates. Axi gives investors the opportunity to enter some popular markets with small budgets, including Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Cryptocurrency, particularly IPOs, using its advanced software—the Axi Trading platform (newly launched), Copy Trading App, MT4, MT4 Webtrader . With no cost during account setup, traders can choose from 3 tailored live accounts in addition to a demo account. Among many forex brokers, Axi stands out due to its user-friendly interface, which allows for quick and simple account opening and withdrawals.
Crypto.com plans to launch a Cronos (CRO) ETF by 2025, expanding its offerings with stocks, banking features, and a stablecoin amid regulatory scrutiny.
In January 2025, gold prices continued to climb in global markets, reaching new historical highs.